Current:Home > MyJudge in Texas orders pause on Biden program that offers legal status to spouses of US citizens-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Judge in Texas orders pause on Biden program that offers legal status to spouses of US citizens
View Date:2025-01-11 05:31:08
McALLEN, Texas (AP) — A federal judge in Texas on Monday ordered a temporary pause on the Biden administration’s new protections that would allow immigrant spouses of U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The administrative stay issued by U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker comes after 16 states, led by Republican attorneys general, challenged the program Friday in a lawsuit that claimed the policy would encourage illegal immigration.
One of the states leading the challenge is Texas, which in the lawsuit claimed the state has had to pay tens of millions of dollars annually from health care to law enforcement because of immigrants living in the state without legal status.
President Joe Biden announced the program in June. The pause comes one week after DHS began accepting applications.
The order puts the program on hold for at least two weeks while the challenge continues.
“The claims are substantial and warrant closer consideration than the court has been able to afford to date,” Barker wrote.
The policy offers spouses of U.S. citizens without legal status, who meet certain criteria, a path to citizenship by applying for a green card and staying in the U.S. while undergoing the process. Traditionally, the process could include a years-long wait outside of the U.S., causing what advocates equate to “family separation.”
The Department of Homeland Security did not immediately return an email seeking comment on the order.
Several families were notified of the receipt of their applications, according to attorneys advocating for eligible families who filed a motion to intervene earlier Monday.
“Texas should not be able to decide the fate of hundreds of thousands of U.S. citizens and their immigrant spouses without confronting their reality,” Karen Tumlin, the founder and director of Justice Action Center, said during the press conference before the order was issued.
The coalition of states accused the administration of bypassing Congress for “blatant political purposes.”
The program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
If approved, applicants have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (72)
Related
- This is Your Sign To Share this Luxury Gift Guide With Your Partner *Hint* *Hint
- Dakota Pipeline Builder Rebuffed by Feds in Bid to Restart Work on Troubled Ohio Gas Project
- Facing floods: What the world can learn from Bangladesh's climate solutions
- Some Mexican pharmacies sell pills laced with deadly fentanyl to U.S. travelers
- Oprah Winfrey denies being paid $1M for Kamala Harris rally: 'I was not paid a dime'
- A new Arkansas law allows an anti-abortion monument at the state Capitol
- The U.S. has a high rate of preterm births, and abortion bans could make that worse
- Scientists Track a Banned Climate Pollutant’s Mysterious Rise to East China
- FC Cincinnati player Marco Angulo dies at 22 after injuries from October crash
- Georgia governor signs bill banning most gender-affirming care for trans children
Ranking
- Ryan Reynolds Makes Dream Come True for 9-Year-Old Fan Battling Cancer
- Teen Mom's Catelynn Lowell Celebrates Carly's 14th Birthday With Sweet Tribute
- Journalists: Apply Now for ICN’s Southeast Environmental Reporting Workshop
- On Father's Day Jim Gaffigan ponders the peculiar lives of childless men
- World leaders aim to shape Earth's future at COP29 climate change summit
- Teen Mom's Catelynn Lowell Celebrates Carly's 14th Birthday With Sweet Tribute
- Pay up, kid? An ER's error sends a 4-year-old to collections
- Ranking Oil Companies by Climate Risk: Exxon Is Near the Top
Recommendation
-
The Daily Money: Inflation is still a thing
-
What to know about xylazine, the drug authorities are calling a public safety threat
-
This Week in Clean Economy: Major Solar Projects Caught Up in U.S.-China Trade War
-
Electric Vehicle Advocates See Threat to Progress from Keystone XL Pipeline
-
DWTS’ Ilona Maher and Alan Bersten Have the Best Reaction to Fans Hoping for a Romance
-
Trump EPA’s ‘Secret Science’ Rule Would Dismiss Studies That Could Hold Clues to Covid-19
-
Maternal deaths in the U.S. spiked in 2021, CDC reports
-
The U.S. has a high rate of preterm births, and abortion bans could make that worse